In an atmosphere of growing tension where the cost of living continues to pressure Aruban households, the debate over the tax system specifically the BBO (Turnover Tax) and the introduction of (BTW) has once again become the center of attention. According to recent statements, both the commercial sector and consumers are sounding the alarm over the “cruel” impact of these taxes on their wallets.
The Unfulfilled Promise of BTW During the last electoral campaign, parties like AVP promised to eliminate the BBO and introduce a BTW system. However, it turned out that MEP also planned to move in that direction after the elections. Contrary to many expectations, this change was never realized. Many remember the firm stance of Minister Geoffrey Wever, who once declared that BTW would be introduced “over my dead body.” While BTW was not implemented, the current concern remains the cumulative impact of the existing BBO, described as an unbearable burden for merchants who must pass these costs on to the end consumer.
Extra Funds: A “Pot of Gold” for the Government One of the strongest points in the discussion is the amount of extra money the Government is receiving. With a 25% increase in international freight prices, tax revenue for the Government’s coffers has risen drastically, even though this was not budgeted. This raises a fundamental question: Why does the Government need so much extra money? According to analysts, this money is entering the “country’s pot,” but it is often not reflected in relief for the citizens. Instead, the government spends money on commercial activities like “Ban Caya” parties to distract the public. Furthermore, it is questioned whether these extra funds are simply being used to meet the requirements of the Financial Supervision Law (LAft) and show a surplus on paper, while the people struggle to put food on the table.
A Call for a “Break” The message to the rulers is clear: if there are unbudgeted funds that entered due to inflation and freight increases, that money must be used to provide direct relief. “Give our people a break, so the people of Aruba can eat,” is the cry resonating through the community. The demand is not for more bureaucratic spending, but to use the “good economy” that the Government boasts about to reduce financial pressure and stop wasting money on unnecessary activities, focusing instead on the families who need it most.